Skip to content

America’s Most Overrated Product

May 24, 2008

Marty Nemko has an article at the Chronicle of Higher Education entitled America’s Most Overrated Product: the Bachelor’s Degree. His piece addresses the plight of the university and, overall, faults the administrations and professors for students not performing well. While I think that the contemporary push for most/all young people to attain a Bachelor’s degree is problematic, I’m not keen on Nemko’s solutions.

Nemko thinks that we should have some sort of national standardization of universities — a packet of information on each institution like the data provided on the side of a tire. Beyond the obvious problem of equating education with a product and implying that a student’s mind is like the rubber that can be molded into whatever shape a university deems appropriate, there’s the issue of specialization.

To take one example from my own career: I think that Brandeis’ Ph.D.’s in Near East and Judaic Studies are top rate, but that doesn’t mean that our Ph.D’s in Neurology are (n.b. I have no idea what the Neuroscience department at Brandeis does, that’s my point). The standard university is more multivalent than any tire store your likely to enter.

Beyond specialization, there’s also the issue of students and faculty being moving targets. By the time any data can be comprised on the performance of students, it’s already out of date. With rapid movement of technology, the changing economic situation, and the seemingly constant reformulation of state primary and secondary educational goals, student data is constantly in flux. The same might be said for most universities as well — though systemic changes tend to move slower through higher ed.

All in all, I think that even providing all the data that Nemko recommends still wouldn’t change a thing. Apples-to-oranges comparisons based on bad data won’t do anything to help potential student make wise choices in higher education.

Advertisements
One Comment leave one →
  1. May 24, 2008 1:51 pm

    Nice observations and I agree with you, Jim. Another problem with these types of data is that departments can change a lot in the time that an undergraduate student is at a particular school–faculty can come and go, curriculum can change, leadership changes bring new emphases, etc. So, just because someone begins a degree within a certain department does not mean that they will graduate from the identical situation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: