Comments on: Interpreting Hermeneutics http://jimgetz.org/2008/04/04/interpretting-hermeneutics/ The musings and wanderings of an academician. Wed, 09 May 2012 22:45:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: jimgetz http://jimgetz.org/2008/04/04/interpretting-hermeneutics/#comment-591 Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:11:50 +0000 http://jimgetz.org/?p=139#comment-591 Erik,
I had a number of answers that could have been both 1 & 5 but not 3, so I feel your angst.

Wezlo,
Bad postmodern, orthodox baptist! I expected at least a 70 out of you. You need to read more Heidegger!

“Name Withheld”,
Since I know who you are and where you went to school, I find your score amazingly humorous.

]]> By: "name withheld" http://jimgetz.org/2008/04/04/interpretting-hermeneutics/#comment-589 Sat, 05 Apr 2008 03:31:08 +0000 http://jimgetz.org/?p=139#comment-589 Damn. I’m out of luck with any evangelical schools. 98 and I felt like the most “liberal” ones were still too conservative. The only thing that was conservative about me what that I thought historical context helps elucidate the meaning of ancient texts.

]]> By: wezlo http://jimgetz.org/2008/04/04/interpretting-hermeneutics/#comment-586 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:09:16 +0000 http://jimgetz.org/?p=139#comment-586 58 – moderate. And it was the confessional instances which made me hedge some answers. Like, the bible in the Church has to be read with respect to Church Tradition – even if you’re going to go against it in light of different evidence.

]]> By: Erik http://jimgetz.org/2008/04/04/interpretting-hermeneutics/#comment-585 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:19:10 +0000 http://jimgetz.org/?p=139#comment-585 68, but not entirely comfortably. A lot of “none of the aboves”.

(My motivation in taking the quiz was also to have an excuse to drop you a fun little bit of information. I was at a lenten potluck at my parish on wednesday, and it turns out one of the parishioners I was talking with, grew up in Ugarit ( well 6miles down the road) thought you should know.)

]]>