Comments on: Paul, Authorship, and Ephesians http://jimgetz.org/2008/03/30/paul-and-authorship/ The musings and wanderings of an academician. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:47:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: James Gregory http://jimgetz.org/2008/03/30/paul-and-authorship/#comment-574 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:25:47 +0000 http://jimgetz.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-574 I think you are correct, too, in thinking that Ephesus was one destination of the letter. I also agree that en epheso is not original.

Sorry to hear that you had some complications. Hopefully it wasn’t as bad as you think. Pauline authorship can be argued without the help of Colossians.

]]> By: wezlo http://jimgetz.org/2008/03/30/paul-and-authorship/#comment-573 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:24:41 +0000 http://jimgetz.wordpress.com/?p=135#comment-573 Sure, Ephesians as a distributed letter makes perfect sense. How did the students take it.

]]>